Criminal Defense Attorney Kevin Kennedy prosecuted robbery cases as a prosecutor in the Davidson County District Attorney’s Office. He now uses that practical experience to defend clients accused of robbery committed in concert with others. Kevin holds his law degree from Vanderbilt Law School and is an active member of the Tennessee Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Client Reviews
What Clients Say
“10/10 was a great help in working my case and helped to an extraordinary degree communicating everything that was going on and that would transpire. I completely would recommend Kevin Kennedy to anyone that needs legal help!!!!”Cameron
When a robbery is committed by a group, Tennessee law does not treat it as an ordinary robbery. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-401, robbery is normally a Class C felony — but a robbery committed in concert with two or more other persons is graded as a Class B felony, roughly doubling the authorized sentencing exposure. The enhancement can apply even to a person who never touched the victim or the property.
That reach is exactly why these cases demand a careful defense: the State must prove knowing participation, not mere presence. If you are facing a robbery-in-concert charge in Nashville or Middle Tennessee, call Kevin Kennedy Law Firm for a free, confidential consultation. The firm’s Nashville robbery page remains the broad guide to robbery charges; this page focuses on the acting-in-concert enhancement.
Tennessee Robbery Law
Robbery is the intentional or knowing theft of property from another person by violence or by putting the person in fear. Ordinary robbery is a Class C felony carrying an authorized range of three to fifteen years. Aggravated robbery — involving a deadly weapon or serious bodily injury — and especially aggravated robbery are separate, more serious offenses addressed on the firm’s aggravated robbery page.
Acting in Concert With Other Persons
The acting-in-concert provision enhances the classification of the robbery itself when the offense is committed in concert with two or more other persons. It is not a wholly separate underlying robbery offense — it is a grading enhancement that turns on how the robbery was carried out and who knowingly participated.
Because the enhancement depends on group participation, the defense should scrutinize whether the State can prove the required number of participants and each person’s knowing involvement. A robbery committed by two people, or by people whose participation the State cannot prove, does not support the enhancement.
Ordinary Robbery Versus the Enhanced Classification
The difference between Class C and Class B is substantial: an authorized range of three to fifteen years becomes eight to thirty years, with the applicable range depending on the offender’s classification. The enhancement also changes plea negotiations, bond considerations, and the practical stakes of trial. The law in effect on the offense date controls, so the exact exposure should be calculated from the indictment and verified criminal history.
Criminal Responsibility for Another Person’s Conduct
Acting-in-concert cases are frequently built on Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-402, Tennessee’s criminal-responsibility statute. A person can be held responsible for an offense committed by another if, acting with the required mental state, the person solicits, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other in committing the offense. The State must prove that level of intentional participation — presence at the scene, association with the participants, or flight afterward is not, standing alone, enough.
Identification Issues
Multi-person robberies are often fast, chaotic, and committed by people in masks or hooded clothing. Identification evidence — eyewitness descriptions, photo lineups, show-ups, and surveillance stills — is frequently the weakest part of the State’s case. The defense can challenge the identification procedure, the reliability of the witness’s opportunity to observe, and inconsistencies between descriptions given at different times.
Evidence of Participation
Prosecutors prove participation through surveillance footage, witness and codefendant testimony, cell-phone records and location data, forensic evidence, and possession of stolen property. Each category has weaknesses. Location data places a phone, not necessarily a person. Fingerprints show contact, not timing. Possession of property after the fact does not by itself prove participation in the taking.
Whether the Defendant Knowingly Participated
Knowing participation is the heart of most concert cases. A person who was present but did not know a robbery was going to occur, who withdrew before the taking, or whose conduct was ambiguous may not be criminally responsible. The defense should develop the timeline, communications, and the accused’s actual conduct before, during, and after the offense.
Witness Testimony and Codefendants
Concert cases frequently depend on a codefendant or accomplice who agreed to testify. That testimony should be investigated aggressively: what deal was offered, what charges were dismissed, how the account has changed over time, and what motive the witness has to shift responsibility. Juries are entitled to hear all of it.
Surveillance Footage
Video can be the State’s best evidence or the defense’s. The defense should obtain the complete footage — not selected clips — and examine quality, angles, timestamps, lighting, and whether the people shown can actually be identified. Footage can also establish what the accused did and did not do during the encounter.
Potential Defenses
- The accused was misidentified.
- The accused was present but did not knowingly participate.
- The State cannot prove two or more other knowing participants.
- The underlying taking does not meet the elements of robbery.
- Codefendant or accomplice testimony is unreliable or purchased by a deal.
- Surveillance or forensic evidence does not connect the accused to the offense.
- Evidence or statements were obtained unconstitutionally.
Sentencing Consequences
A Class B felony carries an authorized range of eight to thirty years, with the applicable range depending on the offender’s classification, plus potential fines. Robbery convictions are also violent offenses with significant parole and collateral consequences. Because the enhancement roughly doubles the exposure of an ordinary robbery, litigating whether the enhancement actually applies is often the most important work in the case.
Related Nashville Defense Pages
- Nashville Robbery Lawyer
- Nashville Aggravated Robbery Lawyer
- Nashville Carjacking Lawyer
- Nashville Theft of Property Lawyer
- All Felonies and Misdemeanors
Frequently Asked Questions About Robbery in Concert
What is robbery in concert in Tennessee?
Tennessee law enhances the classification of a robbery when it is committed while acting in concert with other persons. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-401, ordinary robbery is a Class C felony, while robbery committed in concert with two or more other persons is graded as a Class B felony. It is an enhancement of the robbery classification, not a wholly separate underlying offense.
What does 'acting in concert' mean?
Acting in concert generally means the robbery was carried out with the knowing participation of multiple people working together toward the taking. The State must prove the required number of participants and that the accused knowingly participated — mere presence near a robbery committed by others is not enough.
How many people must be involved for the enhancement?
The enhancement applies when the robbery is committed in concert with two or more other persons. The identity and participation of each alleged participant can be contested, and the defense should examine whether the State can actually prove the required number of knowing participants.
What is the penalty difference?
Ordinary robbery is a Class C felony with an authorized range of three to fifteen years. Robbery committed in concert with two or more other persons is a Class B felony with an authorized range of eight to thirty years. The applicable range within each class depends on the offender’s classification, and the law in effect on the offense date controls.
Can I be convicted of robbery in concert if I never touched the victim or the property?
Potentially, under criminal-responsibility principles — but the State must still prove that you knowingly and intentionally participated in the robbery, not merely that you were present. Presence, association, or even flight after the fact does not automatically establish the required participation.
What is criminal responsibility for another person’s conduct?
Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-402, a person can be criminally responsible for an offense committed by another if the person intentionally solicits, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other in the offense, acting with the required mental state. The defense can contest whether the accused’s conduct actually meets that standard.
How does the State prove participation?
Common evidence includes surveillance footage, witness testimony, codefendant statements, cell-phone records and location data, fingerprints or DNA, and possession of stolen property. Each category can be challenged — codefendant statements in particular often come with deals, inconsistencies, and motives to shift blame.
What if I was misidentified?
Identification is frequently the central issue in multi-person robberies. The defense can challenge the identification procedure, the quality and angle of surveillance footage, lighting and distance, cross-racial identification concerns, and inconsistencies between witness descriptions.
Can the enhancement be negotiated away?
Depending on the evidence, resolutions can include dismissal of the enhancement, a plea to ordinary robbery, or a reduction where the proof of knowing participation is weak. Every case turns on its own evidence and history.
What should I do if I am charged with robbery in concert?
Remain silent — especially about anyone else involved — and contact a defense lawyer promptly. Do not discuss the case on jail calls or messages. Preserve anything that shows where you were and what you did, including location data, receipts, and messages.
Legal references: Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-11-402, 39-13-401, and 40-35-111. This page is general information, not legal advice. Penalty provisions change, and the law in effect on the offense date controls.
If you are facing a robbery-in-concert charge in Nashville or Middle Tennessee, call or text Kevin Kennedy Law Firm at (615) 205-7311 for a free, confidential consultation.