Criminal Defense Attorney Kevin Kennedy prosecuted evading arrest cases as a prosecutor in the Davidson County District Attorney’s Office. He now uses that expertise to defend clients accused of evading arrest in a motor vehicle. Kevin holds his law degree from Vanderbilt Law School and is an active member of the Tennessee Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Client Reviews
What Clients Say
“10/10 was a great help in working my case and helped to an extraordinary degree communicating everything that was going on and that would transpire. I completely would recommend Kevin Kennedy to anyone that needs legal help!!!!”Cameron
Evading arrest becomes a felony in Tennessee the moment a motor vehicle is involved. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-603(b), a person who intentionally flees or attempts to elude a law enforcement officer while operating a motor vehicle — after the officer has given a signal to stop — commits a Class E felony, and the charge rises to a Class D felony when the flight creates a risk of death or injury to innocent bystanders or other third parties.
These cases are often more defensible than they first appear. The prosecution must prove the signal, the accused’s knowledge of it, and intentional flight — and video evidence frequently tells a more complicated story than the arrest report. If you are facing a motor-vehicle evading arrest charge in Nashville or Middle Tennessee, call Kevin Kennedy Law Firm for a free, confidential consultation. The firm’s general evading arrest page remains the broad guide; this page focuses on evading involving a motor vehicle.
Evading Arrest Under T.C.A. § 39-16-603
Section 39-16-603 makes it an offense to intentionally flee or attempt to elude a law enforcement officer after the officer has given a signal to bring the vehicle to a stop. The statute separates evading by how it occurs: evading on foot is generally a Class A misdemeanor, while evading in a motor vehicle is a felony.
That distinction matters enormously. The same brief encounter that would be a misdemeanor on foot becomes a felony because a vehicle was involved — even when no one was hurt and the encounter lasted seconds.
The Elements of Motor-Vehicle Evading Arrest
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer gave a signal to stop, that the accused knew the officer was attempting to stop the vehicle, and that the accused intentionally fled or attempted to elude the officer while operating the vehicle. A weakness in any element can change the outcome.
The Officer’s Signal to Stop
The statute requires a signal to stop — typically emergency lights, a siren, or another clear direction. The defense should examine what signal was actually given, when it was given, and whether it was perceivable. An unmarked car, a signal given in heavy traffic, a siren that could not be heard over road noise, or lights activated only moments before the stop all undermine the claim that the accused knowingly fled.
Whether the Driver Knew the Officer Was Attempting a Stop
Knowledge is a separate element. A driver who did not realize law enforcement was attempting a stop — because of an unmarked vehicle, obstructed visibility, loud music, a medical issue, or simple confusion — has not committed intentional flight. Dashboard-camera and body-camera footage, along with the officer’s own timing estimates, often determine whether the State can prove knowledge.
Intentional Flight
Evading requires intentional flight or an intentional attempt to elude. Not every delay in stopping is flight. Drivers commonly continue to a well-lit area, a parking lot, or the next exit before stopping — behavior that can look like flight in a report but reflects caution rather than evasion. Mechanical problems, confusion about which vehicle was being stopped, and momentary panic followed by compliance are all factual circumstances the defense should develop.
Risk of Death or Injury and Felony Grading
Motor-vehicle evading is generally a Class E felony, carrying an authorized range of one to six years. When the State proves the flight created a risk of death or injury to innocent bystanders or other third parties, the offense becomes a Class D felony, carrying two to twelve years. The applicable range within each class depends on the offender’s classification, and a conviction can also carry driver’s-license consequences.
The risk allegation is frequently the most contested part of the case. Speed alone may not establish the required risk; the defense should examine the actual driving — duration, distance, traffic density, time of day, road conditions, and whether any other vehicle or pedestrian was genuinely endangered.
Dash-Camera and Body-Camera Evidence
Video is often the most important evidence in a vehicle evading case. Patrol-car dash cameras can show when lights and sirens were activated, how the accused’s vehicle actually moved, and the real duration and intensity of any pursuit. Body cameras capture the officer’s statements at the scene. The defense should demand all video early, including from every unit involved, and compare it frame by frame against the arrest report.
Vehicle and Driver Identification
The State must prove who was driving — not merely who owned the vehicle. Cases involving a vehicle found abandoned, multiple occupants, a driver who switched seats, or an identification made hours or days later present genuine reasonable-doubt issues. Registration evidence alone does not prove the identity of the driver.
Pursuit Evidence
Prosecutors build pursuit cases from officer testimony, GPS and speed data, radio logs, aviation or camera footage, and sometimes accident reconstruction. Each category can be tested: speed estimates are often approximate, radio logs can contradict testimony, and pursuit policies may show the officers themselves escalated the encounter.
Constitutional Issues
The underlying stop, any detention after the stop, searches of the vehicle, and statements taken from the accused must all comply with the Constitution. If the initial attempted stop lacked reasonable suspicion, or if evidence was gathered through an unlawful search or interrogation, a motion to suppress may remove it. Statements made before Miranda warnings, or after a request for counsel, can be challenged as well.
Potential Defenses
- No clear signal to stop was given, or the signal was not perceivable.
- The accused did not know law enforcement was attempting a stop.
- The driving was not intentional flight — the accused was seeking a safe place to stop.
- The accused was not the driver.
- The flight did not create the alleged risk of death or injury.
- The stop, search, or interrogation was unconstitutional.
- Video evidence contradicts the officer’s account.
Related Nashville Defense Pages
- Nashville Evading Arrest Lawyer
- Nashville Resisting Arrest Lawyer
- Nashville Reckless Driving Lawyer
- Nashville Leaving the Scene of an Accident Lawyer
- Nashville Reckless Endangerment Lawyer
- All Felonies and Misdemeanors
Frequently Asked Questions About Motor-Vehicle Evading Arrest
Is evading arrest in a motor vehicle a felony in Tennessee?
Yes. Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-603(b), evading arrest while operating a motor vehicle is generally a Class E felony. If the flight creates a risk of death or injury to innocent bystanders or other third parties, the offense can be elevated to a Class D felony. Evading on foot, by contrast, is generally a Class A misdemeanor.
What must the prosecution prove in a motor-vehicle evading case?
The State must prove that the officer gave a signal to stop, that the accused knew the officer intended to stop the vehicle, and that the accused intentionally fled or attempted to elude the officer while operating the vehicle. Each element — the signal, the knowledge, and the intentional flight — can be contested.
What if I did not know it was the police behind me?
Knowledge is a required element. Disputes arise when the officer’s vehicle was unmarked, the emergency lights or siren were not clearly visible or audible, traffic or weather obscured the signal, or the accused reasonably did not realize a stop was being attempted. Dash-camera and body-camera footage can be decisive on this issue.
What is the difference between misdemeanor and felony evading arrest?
Evading arrest on foot is generally a Class A misdemeanor. Evading arrest while operating a motor vehicle is a felony regardless of how short the pursuit was. The vehicle is what changes the classification, which is why the defense examines exactly what the accused was doing and when.
What does 'risk of death or injury' do to the charge?
When the State alleges that the flight created a risk of death or injury to innocent bystanders or other third parties, the offense can be graded as a Class D felony instead of a Class E felony. Whether the driving actually created that risk — speed, traffic conditions, duration, and location — is often heavily disputed.
What are the penalties for motor-vehicle evading arrest?
A Class E felony carries an authorized range of one to six years and a fine, and a Class D felony carries two to twelve years, with the applicable range depending on offender classification. A conviction can also affect the accused’s driver’s license. The law in effect on the offense date controls.
Can dash-camera or body-camera footage help the defense?
Yes. Footage can show whether a clear signal to stop was given, when it was given, whether it was visible or audible, how the accused actually drove, and whether the pursuit created the risk the State alleges. The defense should demand and review all available video early.
What if the police identified the wrong driver?
Vehicle identification and driver identification are separate issues. The State must prove who was driving, not just who owned the vehicle. Cases involving abandoned vehicles, multiple occupants, or late identifications can present serious reasonable-doubt issues.
Can a short or slow 'pursuit' still be charged as felony evading?
The State sometimes charges evading based on a brief delay in stopping. Whether the driving was intentional flight — as opposed to looking for a safe place to stop, mechanical trouble, or confusion — is a factual question the defense can litigate.
What should I do after being charged with evading arrest in a vehicle?
Remain silent and contact a defense lawyer promptly. Write down your recollection of the route, the first moment you saw or heard any signal, traffic and weather conditions, and any reason you did not stop immediately. Preserve any video you have, including doorbell or dash-camera footage.
Legal references: Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-16-603 and 40-35-111. This page is general information, not legal advice. Penalty provisions change, and the law in effect on the offense date controls.
If you are facing a motor-vehicle evading arrest charge in Nashville or Middle Tennessee, call or text Kevin Kennedy Law Firm at (615) 205-7311 for a free, confidential consultation.