Criminal defense attorney Kevin Kennedy prosecuted hundreds of aggravated assault cases as a prosecutor in the Davidson County District Attorney’s Office. He now uses that experience to defend clients accused of aggravated assault involving a deadly weapon. Kevin holds his law degree from Vanderbilt Law School and is an active member of the Tennessee Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Client Reviews
What Clients Say
“10/10 was a great help in working my case and helped to an extraordinary degree communicating everything that was going on and that would transpire. I completely would recommend Kevin Kennedy to anyone that needs legal help!!!!”CameronOur Results
An accusation that you pointed a firearm, raised a knife, swung a bottle, or used another object during a confrontation can lead to felony prosecution in Davidson County. A Nashville aggravated assault deadly weapon lawyer should examine what the object actually was, how it was used or displayed, the alleged victim’s perception, and the mental state charged—not simply accept the word “weapon” in a police report.
This page addresses the weapon-based charge specifically. For the other statutory ways an assault can become a felony, see our general Nashville aggravated assault overview.
Aggravated Assault With a Weapon Under Tennessee Law
Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-13-102(a)(1)(A)(iii) covers an intentional or knowing assault that involves the use or display of a deadly weapon. The underlying assault comes from § 39-13-101: causing bodily injury; causing another person reasonably to fear imminent bodily injury; or causing physical contact that a reasonable person would regard as extremely offensive or provocative, with the mental state required for the charged alternative.
The ordinary reckless weapon alternative, § 39-13-102(a)(1)(B)(iii), is narrower: it requires an assault under § 39-13-101(a)(1), meaning conduct causing bodily injury. Reckless conduct alone, without the underlying bodily-injury assault, does not satisfy that particular alternative. The indictment and proof must identify the correct theory.
What Qualifies as a Deadly Weapon?
Under § 39-11-106, a deadly weapon includes a firearm or anything manifestly designed, made, or adapted for inflicting death or serious bodily injury. It also includes anything that, in the manner of its use or intended use, is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.
This second category makes context important. A bottle, heavy tool, vehicle, or other ordinary object may qualify because of how it was used or intended to be used. That does not mean every bottle, tool, or vehicle at an incident is a deadly weapon. Counsel should examine the object’s characteristics, distance, movement, force, alleged target, and the evidence of intended use.
The object does not have to inflict an actual injury to meet the deadly-weapon definition. Capability in the alleged manner of use or intended use can be enough. A replica or disputed object requires its own analysis; an accusation that something looked like a firearm should not replace proof that it satisfied the definition.
Using Versus Displaying a Weapon
The statute uses “use or display,” not “use and display.” A weapon may be used to strike, cut, or otherwise apply force. Display allegations can involve presenting or pointing a weapon during an encounter in a way that satisfies an underlying assault. Words, gestures, proximity, sight lines, and the sequence of events can distinguish an alleged threatening display from mere possession.
A firearm does not have to be discharged for an intentional or knowing weapon-based assault. Physical contact and bodily injury are also unnecessary when the prosecution proves that the defendant intentionally or knowingly caused reasonable fear of imminent bodily injury and that the assault involved a deadly weapon. Fear of some possible future harm is not a substitute for the required imminent-injury element.
Conversely, lawful carrying, ownership, or a weapon’s mere visibility does not automatically establish guilt. The State still must prove an assault and the required weapon involvement. A carry permit or otherwise lawful possession also does not automatically authorize threatening or unjustified conduct.
What the Prosecution Must Prove
- The accused was the person responsible for the charged conduct.
- The conduct satisfied the underlying assault alternative alleged in the charge.
- The required intentional, knowing, or reckless mental state was present.
- The assault involved use or display of an object meeting Tennessee’s deadly-weapon definition.
- Any additional elements supporting a charged enhancement or special statutory provision were established.
At trial, the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. When self-defense or another justification is fairly raised by the evidence, the applicable burden and jury instructions must be addressed. Evidence that a weapon existed is not a shortcut around the remaining elements.
Felony Classifications and Potential Penalties
Under the ordinary weapon provisions, intentional or knowing aggravated assault is generally a Class C felony. The overall statutory imprisonment range for Class C is 3 to 15 years. Reckless aggravated assault under the ordinary alternative is generally a Class D felony, with an overall range of 2 to 12 years. These are class-wide ranges, not a prediction of a particular defendant’s sentence.
The applicable offender range, criminal history, enhancement and mitigating factors, exact statutory subsection, and offense date affect sentencing. Other aggravated-assault provisions and special-victim circumstances can change the classification or punishment. Fine limits, release eligibility, and eligibility for a noncustodial sentence must be calculated under the provisions actually applicable to the case; do not assume every weapon allegation has the same sentence or allows probation.
A felony conviction can also affect firearm rights, employment, professional licensing, and immigration status. Bond orders may restrict contact or weapon possession before trial. Advice about a proposed plea should address these consequences as well as the immediate sentence.
Potential Defenses to a Deadly-Weapon Allegation
Self-Defense and Defense of Others
Tennessee’s justification statutes, §§ 39-11-611 and 39-11-612, govern qualifying protection of oneself or another person. The analysis includes the perceived immediate threat, whether the belief was reasonable, the degree of force, and statutory limitations. Force intended or likely to cause death or serious bodily injury is subject to stricter requirements. A disagreement or insult alone does not establish a right to use deadly force.
Kevin examines who initiated or escalated the confrontation, whether someone else had a weapon, opportunities and obligations relevant to withdrawal or retreat, injuries to the accused, and recordings showing what the accused reasonably perceived. Our Nashville self-defense page discusses the broader justification framework.
Disputed Use, Display, or Weapon Identification
Witnesses may disagree about whether an object was drawn, pointed, raised, or used at all. Counsel can compare first statements with later accounts and test whether darkness, distance, obstructions, or brief observation made identification unreliable. Photographs, recovered objects, forensic testing when relevant, and uninterrupted video can clarify what occurred.
Missing Intent or the Required Mental State
Accidental contact, an unexpected movement, or a misunderstood gesture may not establish the mental state charged. The defense must distinguish an accident from statutory recklessness and examine whether the evidence supports the specific intentional, knowing, or reckless theory. Saying there was no intent to injure does not automatically defeat a knowing fear-based assault.
Witness Credibility, Conflicting Statements, and Video
Material differences about where a weapon was located, what was said, when it became visible, and who approached whom can be important. Counsel should compare 911 audio, body-camera footage, surveillance, messages, and witness interviews rather than treating one account as conclusive. Video may support either side; the full recording and timeline matter more than a selected still image.
Unlawfully Obtained Evidence
Searches yielding an alleged weapon and custodial questioning should be reviewed for constitutional compliance. A suppression motion may be appropriate when evidence was obtained unlawfully. Suppression is not automatic, and other admissible proof may remain even if one item is excluded.
How Kevin Kennedy Reviews a Nashville Weapon-Based Assault Case
The defense begins by matching the warrant or indictment to the statutory elements and building a timeline of the encounter. Kevin reviews the available recordings, statements, physical evidence, and client account to identify disputed weapon involvement, missing mental-state proof, and supported defenses.
A Davidson County felony case may involve a bond hearing, a preliminary hearing in General Sessions Court, grand-jury consideration, and proceedings in Criminal Court. Not every case follows every step. Preserve videos, photographs, messages, and witness information promptly; surveillance can be overwritten. Follow all release conditions and obtain advice before discussing the allegation with investigators.
Frequently Asked Questions About Weapon-Based Aggravated Assault
Can pointing a gun be aggravated assault if no shot is fired?
Yes, potentially. An intentional or knowing assault involving display of a firearm can qualify when it causes reasonable fear of imminent bodily injury. Discharge, injury, and physical contact are not required for that theory, but the State must still prove every element.
Is showing a weapon automatically aggravated assault?
No. Lawful possession, carrying, or the mere presence of a weapon does not by itself establish an assault. The circumstances must satisfy the charged assault elements and the use-or-display requirement, and any supported justification must be considered.
Can a bottle, tool, or vehicle qualify as a deadly weapon?
Potentially. An ordinary object can qualify if, in the manner of its use or intended use, it is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury. Its presence at the scene alone is not enough to establish that manner of use.
Does the weapon itself have to cause an injury?
Not necessarily. The intentional or knowing fear-of-imminent-injury theory does not require injury at all. A reckless aggravated-assault theory under the ordinary weapon provision, however, requires an underlying assault causing bodily injury.
Does a weapon allegation always mean a Class C felony?
No. Ordinary intentional or knowing weapon-based aggravated assault is generally a Class C felony; the ordinary reckless alternative is generally Class D. The precise subsection, any applicable enhancement, and the law on the offense date must be checked.
Can I claim self-defense after displaying a weapon?
Possibly, if the evidence satisfies Tennessee's justification statutes. Counsel must examine the immediate threat, the level of force used or threatened, the defendant's reasonable belief, and statutory limitations. Possessing a weapon legally does not automatically justify its use.
What if police never recover the alleged weapon?
Recovery is not an express element of the offense, so the prosecution may rely on other admissible evidence. A missing weapon can still matter when testing identification, witness accounts, whether the object qualified as deadly, and whether it was used or displayed.
Can the charge be reduced if the deadly-weapon element is unsupported?
Potentially. Counsel may challenge the felony element or negotiate an appropriate resolution when proof is insufficient. A lesser charge, dismissal, or acquittal depends on the evidence and legal issues; no outcome is guaranteed.
Free Consultation and Payment Plans Available
For a confidential review of an aggravated assault involving a deadly weapon in Nashville or Middle Tennessee, call 615-205-7311 or text Kevin Kennedy Law Firm. Consultation is free, and payment plans are available. Case outcomes depend on the facts, evidence, and applicable law.
Related Nashville Criminal Defense Pages
When the allegation concerns interference with breathing or blood circulation rather than weapon use, see the separate aggravated assault by strangulation or attempted strangulation page.
Legal references: Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-101, 39-13-102, 39-11-106, 39-11-611, 39-11-612, and 40-35-111. This page provides general legal information, not legal advice. The law applicable to the offense date and the specific charged subsection should be reviewed with an attorney.